Per Curiam.
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Magie, Reed, Bogert, Brown, Clement, Smith, Whitaker. 10. For reversal — None.
THE STATE, CHARLES W. MAXSON ET AL., PROSECUTORS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM SEGOINE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
54 N.J.L. 212
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.