Per Curiam.
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Van Syciiel, Bogert, Brown, Clement, Krueger, Smith, Whitaker. 11. For reversal — None.
DE LANCEY CLEVELAND, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. STEWART HARTSHORNE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
54 N.J.L. 391
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.