LAW.coLAW.co

Isabella Georgi, Respondent, v. Frank Alexe et al., Appellants

New York City Court1895
14 Misc. 657

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Fitzsimous, J.

The issues presented by the allegation contained in the- “ fii-st defense ” are clear and unmistakable, and if sustained are sufficient to defeat the plaintiff herein.

As to the second defense, so called, in the answer, I am notable to find therein any defense to this cause of action, except-that part of 7th paragraph which alleges “that the notes in suit were procured from defendant without consideration.” This is simply d repetition of the first defense in substance,, and is, therefore, redundant matter,-and all.the other matters-, set forth are clearly irrelevant to the issue herein and have no> legdl merit, so that the order appealed from was properly-made and is affirmed, with costs. McCaethy and Cójtlan, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs.