Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in Judge Leonard’s opinion in the Chancery Division, reported at 82 N. J. Super. 562.
TAVE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BENJAMIN WIESENFELD AND BESS WIESENFELD, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND FRANKLYN B. SPIEZLE AND WINDSOR CONSTRUCTION CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS
90 N.J. Super. 244
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.