LAW.coLAW.co

WILFRED TANTUM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHARLES D. BINZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT

Supreme Court of New Jersey1982-10-18
91 N.J. 426

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Botter, reported at 186 N.J.Super. 296, 302 (1981). For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK and O’HERN —6.

For affirmance —None.