LAW.coLAW.co

Pacific Employers Insurance Company, Appellant, v. United Talmudical Academy, Respondent, et al., Defendant

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division1996-05-21
227 A.D.2d 304642 N.Y.S.2d 319

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered June 9, 1995, which, after a nonjury trial, declared that plaintiff is obligated to defend and indemnify defendant-respondent in a certain pending action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record supports the trial court’s finding that defendant, a religious institution that operates 13 schools in the region, had a practice, condoned by plaintiff, based on the frequency of injury-causing incidents in its schools, that it need not report an incident of this type until a summons was served, thus excusing the 16-month delay between the incident and the notice defendant gave plaintiff promptly after it was sued (see, Mighty Midgets v Centennial Ins. Co., 47 NY2d 12, 19; White v City of New York, 81 NY2d 955, 957). Concur — Sullivan J. P., Milonas, Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.