Per Curiam.
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons.given by the Supreme Court. For affirmance—The Chancelloe, Dixon, G-aeeison, Lippincott, Bogeet, Beown, Clement, Keuegeb, ■Smith. 9. For reversal—None.
THE STATE, SAMUEL K. WILSON, PROSECUTOR, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE INHABITANTS OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
56 N.J.L. 716
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.