Per Curiam.
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.
For affirmance.—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Abbett, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Bogert, Brown, Krueger, Phelps, Smith. 11. For reversal—None.
LAWRENCE RAYMOND, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. LAURA CHAMPION, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
56 N.J.L. 714
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.