The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility, including its finding that the victim had a sufficient opportunity to observe appellant and make a reliable identification. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
In the Matter of Mahamadou H., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant
99 A.D.3d 528951 N.Y.S.2d 868
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.