LAW.coLAW.co

JOHN HOEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, AND ZADOCK H. JARMAN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1878-06
40 N.J.L. 379

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court. 10 Vroom 523. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Dixon, Eeed,Woodhull, Clement, Dodd, Green, Lilly, Wales. 9. Far reversal—None.