LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keslin JOSEPH, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit2013-04-01No. No. 12-12537
514 F. App'x 947

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gary Kollin, appointed counsel for Kes-lin Joseph in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Joseph’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Nevertheless, because Joseph’s criminal judgment contains two scrivener’s errors, we issue a LIMITED REMAND for the district court to correct those errors, which will require the court to (1) alter the description of the offense in Count Two from “Delivering a firearm for shipment to a common carrier with notice” to “Delivering a firearm for shipment to a common carrier without notice;” and (2) correct a typographical error in Count Three, specifically, delete the additional “t” in the word “the.”