LAW.coLAW.co

Nathan Hutkoff, Respondent, v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Co., Appellant

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term1900-03
30 Misc. 802

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence of the witness Sammeck warrants a conclusion that the-glass was in good condition when it was delivered upon the car. . As the defendant’s counsel upon the argument conceded that if this conclusion was warranted the judgment must be affirmed, it is-affirmed, with costs. Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.