LAW.coLAW.co

Jesse D. Crary, Respondent, v. Julian A. Dimock et al., Appellants

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term1900-02
30 Misc. 781

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

No question of law is presented for our review, and as the conflict of fact was correctly disposed of below, it follows that the judgment must be affirmed. Present: Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.