LAW.coLAW.co

THE CITY OF SUMMIT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HORTON CORPORATION, A CORPORATION, ETC., CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ETC., AND TOWNVIEW MANOR A, A CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ETC., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES BORINSKY, ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS

New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division1962-10-04
76 N.J. Super. 346

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

After reviewing the lengthy record, and considering the briefs and oral arguments of counsel, we conclude that the judgment must be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed by Judge Mintz in the Chancery Division, 70 N. J. Super. 529 (1961).