UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peter PAUL, a/k/a Derrick Anderson, a/k/a Paul Eustance, a/k/a Mark Harris, a/k/a Mark Eric Green, a/k/a Peter P. Alexander, a/k/a Sluggie, a/k/a Peter Paul Alexander, Defendant-Appellant

PER CURIAM.

Peter Paul seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Paul’s motions for a certificate of appealability and to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Paul, Nos. CR-95-104; CA-01-505-3 (E.D.Va. Aug. 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.