Per Curiam.
The judgment of the court below should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Knapp, Reed, Scudder, Cole, Green, Kirk, Paterson, Whitaker. 11. For reversal — None.
HENRY G. WAGONER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. CATHERINE WATTS, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
45 N.J.L. 184
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.