LAW.coLAW.co

Summit Rovins & Feldesman, Respondent, v. Fonar Corporation, Appellant

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division1996-06-13
228 A.D.2d 246643 N.Y.S.2d 343

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

The IAS Court properly rejected defendant’s document demands since information concerning plaintiff’s billings to other clients is not material and necessary to the defense of the action (CPLR 3101 [a]).

Upon reargument, the unpublished decision and order of this Court entered on April 23, 1996 (Appeal No. 57633) recalled and vacated and a new decision and order substituted therefor, decided simultaneously herewith. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.