LAW.coLAW.co

Mary E. Nakatsu, Appellant, v. Thomas Moffett, Defendant, and United Artists Communications, Inc., Respondent

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division1996-06-06
228 A.D.2d 782643 N.Y.S.2d 425

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Casey, J.

Based upon our review of the record, we find that the evidence so preponderates in favor of defendant United Artists Communications, Inc. on the issue of notice to that defendant, actual or constructive, of the slippery condition which caused or contributed to plaintiff’s injuries that the verdict could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence. Supreme Court, therefore, correctly granted the motion to set aside the verdict (see, Lolik v Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744, 746) and its judgment dismissing the complaint should be affirmed.

Mercure, J. P., White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.