The Supreme Court erred in holding that the reduction in coverage clause was enforceable (see, Matter of Paolilli v Aetna Ins. Co., 228 AD2d 683 [decided herewith]). Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
In the Matter of Carolyn Herrington, Appellant, v. Aetna Insurance Company, Respondent
228 A.D.2d 680644 N.Y.S.2d 992
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.