The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in relieving the default of the third-party plaintiffs in responding to the third-party defendants’ notice to admit (see, CPLR 3123, 2005; Gutenplan v Dauman, 154 AD2d 337). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.
C. Pavlou, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Gaetano Gargano et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.); Cardon Brick Corp., Appellant, v. Frank Cusimano et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 2.); Gaetano Gargano et al., Third-Party PlaintiffsRespondents, v. Carmine Sirico et al., Third-Party DefendantsAppellants. (Action No. 3.)
228 A.D.2d 632644 N.Y.S.2d 994
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.