LAW.coLAW.co

Harriet R. McKim, Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant; Thomas Buchanan Winthrop, Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant

New York Court of Appeals1900-01-09
161 N.Y. 638

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

These two appeals involve the same questions which were raised in the Kernochan Case (161 N. Y. 339), decided at the present term, and the judgments should be affirmed upon the opinion in that case, with costs. All concur, except Parker, Oh. J., not sitting, and O’Brien, J., dissenting.

affirmed.