Rounsaville & Brother v. Watters

In this case the plaintiffs contended that the defendant in fi. fa. paid certain amounts on the purchase money of the lots levied on; that he fraudulently transferred his stock of goods and his interest in said lots, but continued to manage the goods, and from sales thereof used certain amounts in improving the lots. The jury found the property not subject, and plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial was overruled.