Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the September 2010 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the May 2010 Appellate Division order, dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness as required by Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR) § 500.22 (b) (2). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
Victor Batshever et al., Appellants, v. Jafar Jafar et al., Respondents
16 N.Y.3d 731
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.