LAW.coLAW.co

Swift against Hopkins

New York Supreme Court of Judicature1816-08
13 Johns. 313

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

Unless the contractor shows distinctly that, in making the contract, he expressly, or ostensibly, acted as a public agent, it must be deemed a private contract* The return does not show that Swift assumed to act- in ,an official capacity when he made this contract: and the reason assigned by him for refusing to pay, was, that he could not make a charge of it against the government, is decisive to show that it was a private contract.

Judgment affirmed.