Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the February 2012 Appellate Division order as denied appellant’s motion for poor person relief and dismissed his appeal from the March 2010 Supreme Court order, dismissed upon the ground that such portions of the Appellate Division order do not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
Alson Alston, Appellant, v. New York City Commission on Human Rights et al., Respondents
19 N.Y.3d 1021
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.