Per Curiam.
The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Tenenbaum reported in 27 N. J. Super. 125 (Cty. Ct. 1953).
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. ONEIDA MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT; STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM H. MERRITT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
28 N.J. Super. 329
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.