MEMORANDUM
Alexis Mager Lakusta appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his Chapter 7 case. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review decisions of the bankruptcy court independently without deference to the district court’s determinations. Leichty v. Neary (In re Strand), 375 F.3d 854, 857 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm. The bankruptcy court did not improperly dismiss Lakusta’s claims on any of the grounds asserted.
Evans’s request for sanctions is denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.