LAW.coLAW.co

J. Ford against Stuart

New York Supreme Court of Judicature1822-01
19 Johns. 342

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

Two questions were made : 1st, Whether the assignee of the judgment had a right to set it off, against the note, if the judgment had been legally assigned ? 2. Whether, as in this case, a judgment can be assigned by writing without seal. On the first point, it appeals that when the defendant purchased the judgment, Obadiah Ford then held this note, as payee, against the defendant, as maker; and it was not endorsed to the plaintiff, until several months after it was due. The plaintiff, therefore, took the note subject to all equity. We think the case of Tuttle v. Beebee, (8 Johns. Rep. 152.) is decisive of the right to set-off this judgment, in favor of the assignee. The only difference is, that, in that case, a bond was assigned, and in this, a judgment. We, are, also, clearly of opinion, that a judgment may be assigned without a seal. When we speak of it, in regard to its assignable quality, it is a mere chosein action, The set-off was, therefore, properly allowed ; and the plaintiff is entitled to judgment for the balance only, according to the verdict.

New trial refused.