LAW.coLAW.co

RYDER & ux. v. ROBINSON

Maine Supreme Judicial Court1822-10
2 Me. 127

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

And the Court, for this reason, refused the amendment *, and the writ abated.

The counsel for the tenant then moved for costs against the surviving demandant, which the Court refused, the writ being abated by the act of God*