Lumpkin, J.
1. One who was a stranger to a proceeding to> establish a copy of a lost deed, and who neither claims under . the grantee therein nor is.in privity with him, is not estopped. from attacking the correctness of the copy established.
2. It appearing from the evidence in the record, taken all together, that the plaintiff below was not a party to the proceeding to establish the .lost copy.in question, the court erred in rejecting evidence offered by him to show that the copy was-not in fact correct, and properly corrected this error by granting. a new trial. Judgment affirmed.