LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Derryl THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2010-01-08No. No. 08-50563
361 F. App'x 878

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

MEMORANDUM

Antonio Derryl Thomas appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a 30-day sentence of imprisonment, plus a new 32-month term of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Thomas’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.