MEMORANDUM
In these consolidated appeals, Dean John Perri appeals from the consecutive three-month sentences imposed upon revocation of supei-vised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Perri contends that the sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to consider all of the factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), impermissibly relied upon factors omitted from § 3583(e), and placed undue weight on his criminal history. The record reflects that the district court did not improperly rely upon factors omitted under § 3583(e), considered the appropriate sentencing factors, and that the sentence below the guidelines range is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1176, 1181-82 (9th Cir.2006) (stating that sentences imposed upon supervised release are reviewed for reasonableness and discussing the factors a district court may consider upon imposition of such sentence).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.