LAW.coLAW.co

Julius Grolock, Administrator, et al. vs. Emil Haefenfeldtz et als.

Connecticut Supreme Court1923-11-07
99 Conn. 732

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The errors assigned are all predicated upon corrections of the finding. We have duly considered the evidence and cannot hold that the court found facts’ or failed to find facts, essential to the judgment, incorrectly. The conclusions of the trial court could have been reasonably reached upon the evidence and the inferences drawn from it. There is no error.