LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jason Ryan HOLDEN, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2010-01-25No. No. 09-30156
363 F. App'x 476

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jason Ryan Holden appeals from the 240-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for receipt of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Holden contends that the district court erred at sentencing by failing to consider the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and provide an adequate explanation for his sentence. He also contends that his sentence is unreasonable in light of his difficult childhood, admission of responsibility, and need for psychiatric treatment. The record indicates that the district court did not procedurally err and that Holden’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 356-59, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); see also United States v. Overton, 573 F.3d 679, 698-701 (9th Cir.2009).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.