LAW.coLAW.co

IN RE APPLICATION FOR DISCIPLINE OF EUGENE A. RERAT

Minnesota Supreme Court1948-12-24No. No. 34,475
227 Minn. 248

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

concurrence opinion

Peterson, Justice (concurring in result). I concur in the result.

majority opinion

Pee Cueiam.

This is an application by the petitioner to open the above proceeding to present additional evidence before the Honorable Rol E. Barron, the referee, whose report now before us is based upon evidence introduced at a hearing extending from March 8 to April 1, 1948. After careful consideration of the proposed evidence relative to charges presented to the referee, we conclude that such evidence would not change the findings of the referee, before whom the principal proposed witness’s deposition was read upon the hear ing and who has already indicated that such witness is not entitled to credence. If as suggested by counsel the petitioner has evidence in support of additional charges, the obvious relief as to such charges is to file a petition covering them.

Application denied.

concurrence opinion

Thomas Gallagher, Justice (concurring in result). I concur in the result.