LAW.coLAW.co

NATIONAL MEAT ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, and American Meat Institute, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Kamala D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; Edmund G. Brown Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California; State of California, Defendants-Appellants, and The Humane Society of the United States; Farm Sanctuary, Inc.; Humane Farming Association; Animal Legal Defense Fund, Defendant-Intervenors; National Meat Association, Plaintiff-Appellee, and American Meat Institute, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Kamala D. Harris, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; Edmund G. Brown Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California; State of California, Defendants, and The Humane Society of the United States; Farm Sanctuary, Inc.; Humane Farming Association; Animal Legal Defense Fund, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2012-06-08No. Nos. 09-15483, 09-15486
680 F.3d 1193

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

ORDER

In light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in National Meat Ass’n v. Harris, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 965, 181 L.Ed.2d 950 (2012), we vacate our prior opinion in National Meat Ass’n v. Brown, 599 F.3d 1093 (9th Cir.2010), and affirm the judgment of the district court. The mandate shall issue forthwith. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b).