PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Hopkins in his opinion for the Tax Court of September 25, 1981, reported at 3 N.J.Tax 356 (Tax Ct.1981).
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Hopkins in his opinion for the Tax Court of September 25, 1981, reported at 3 N.J.Tax 356 (Tax Ct.1981).