Defendant failed to set forth a reasonable excuse for its failure to defend against this action to foreclose on a mechanic’s lien, since it offered no financial proof of its claim that it was unable to afford counsel (see Buro Happold Consulting Engrs., P.C. v RMJM, 107 AD3d 602 [1st Dept 2013]). Absent a reasonable excuse for the default, we need not determine whether defendant demonstrated a potentially meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Benson Park Assoc., LLC v Herman, 73 AD3d 464 [1st Dept 2010]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Gische and Clark, JJ.
Expo Development Corp., Respondent, v. 824 South East Boulevard Realty Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendant
113 A.D.3d 549978 N.Y.S.2d 852
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.