LAW.coLAW.co

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael J. Urbanak, Appellant

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division2014-01-08
113 A.D.3d 643977 N.Y.S.2d 918

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty should be vacated because the facts to which he allocated do not actually constitute a crime is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Pryor, 11 AD3d 565 [2004]). In any event, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the facts to which he allocated constituted the crime of attempted assault in the second degree (see Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.05 [9]; see also People v Baez, 13 AD3d 463, 464 [2004]; cf. People v Smielecki, 77 AD3d 1420, 1421-1422 [2010]). Mastro, J.P., Balkin, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.