MEMORANDUM
Shah Nazrul, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reissue the BIA’s prior order due to ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, Reyes v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 592, 595 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Nazrul’s motion to reopen for failure to comply with the requirements set forth in Matter of Lozada, 19 I. & N. Dec. 637, 639 (BIA 1988), where Nazrul failed to file a state bar complaint or include evidence that he informed his attorney of the allegations against him, and the ineffective assistance is not plain on the face of the record. See Reyes, 358 F.3d at 597-99.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.