Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in concluding that the additional discovery of financial documents sought by the appellant was neither material nor necessary in the defense of the action (see CFLR 3101 [a]; Constantino v Dock’s Clam Bar & Pasta House, 60 AD3d 612 [2009]).
The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.P., Cohen, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.