PER CURIAM.
We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Andrew in his opinion for the Tax Court of August 4, 1981, reported at 3 N.J.Tax 105, 437 A.2d 353 (Tax Ct.1981).
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF UNION, HUNTERDON COUNTY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT; STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN, SOMERSET COUNTY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT; STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF ALEXANDRIA, HUNTERDON COUNTY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
5 N.J. Tax 476
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.