Julian Edward ROCHESTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA; Richland County Judicial Center; Jean H. Toal; Henry F. Floyd, Judge; H.B. Richardson; South Carolina Department of Corrections; H.M. Herlong, Judge; Robert S. Carr; Casey Manning; J.R. Barker; NFN McBride; 1040 Defendants; Barack Obama, President; Seneca Daily Journal And Messenger; Anderson Independent News; Greenville News; The State Newspaper; The Post and Courier; New York Times; Tigertown Observer; Knight Ridder, Incorporated; United States of America; Central Intelligence Agency; Federal Bureau of Investiga tion; Jon Ozmint, Director; Mark Sanford, Governor; Solicitor General; Civil Rights Lawyers, USDOJ; A.W. Woodhous; E. Stephens; Bill Clinton; George W. Bush; United States Supreme Court; Wis Television 10, Respondents-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2010-05-18No. No. 10-6050

378 F. App'x 374

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion · public domain

majority opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Julian Edward Rochester appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rochester v. South Carolina, No. 2:09-cv-03148-HMH-SC (D.S.C. Dec. 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. AFFIRMED.