Fish, J.
The evidence introduced upon the trial of this ease demanded a verdict for the defendant. Consequently, the court committed no. error in directing a verdict in its favor. Judgment affirmed.
All concurring, except Isumpkin, P. J., absent.
Action for damages. Before F. O. Foster, judge pro bac ■vice. Baldwin superior court. July term, 1898.
Roberts & Pottle, for plaintiff.
Lawton & Cunningham and John T. Allen, for defendant.