LAW.coLAW.co

T. Terell BRYAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY U.S.; U.S. Attorney; Linda Holms; Darrell A. Basinger; Jane Doe, Warden or Superintendent; SCDC, all in, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2012-02-22No. No. 11-7336
466 F. App'x 208

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM:

T. Terell Bryan appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryan v. Defense Tech. US, No. 1:10-cv-02834-TLW, 2011 WL 4435579 (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.