PER CURIAM:
Holly Neil Bennett appeals the district court’s order denying relief on Bennett’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bennett, No. 1:08-cr-00078-IMK-JSK-2 (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.