LAW.coLAW.co

Thomas K. HOGGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harvard STEPHENS, Dr., Chief Physician, Office of Health Services, sued individually and in official capacity; Manickavasager, Dr., Institutional Physician, Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity; Alvin Harris, Dr., Chief Institutional Physician (Past), Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity; Linda Robb, Phlebotomist (Lab Technician), Powhatan Medical Unit (Receiving), sued individually and in official capacity; Fred Schillings, Director of Prison Health Services, sued individually and in official capacity, Defendants-Appellees, and Keith Davis, Warden, Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity; Benita Badgette, Healthcare Adm., Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity; Hoffman, Dr., Institutional Physician, Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity; Amonette, Dr., Chief Institutional Physician, Powhatan Receiving Unit, sued individually and in official capacity; Mary Johnson, Registered Nurse, Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity; Fred Schilling, Defendants

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2012-03-13No. No. 11-7340
469 F. App'x 160

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Kevin Hogge appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hogge v. Stephens, No. 3:09-cv-00582-JRS, 2010 WL 3834849 (E.D. Va. Sept. 24, 2010); 2011 WL 2161100 (June 1), 2011 WL 4352268 (Sept. 6 & 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.