In the Matter of L. H., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. L. H., Appellant

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant argues that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that he was a danger to others because of a mental disorder. The state agrees that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient. Reversed.