LAW.coLAW.co

U.S. v. Michael T. McNaughton

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces2012-07-10No. No. 11-0400/AR
71 M.J. 348

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

CCA 20090596. On further consideration of the granted issue, 71 M.J. 320 (C.A.A.F. 2012) (order granting review, May 23, 2012), and in view of United States v. Humphries, 71 M.J. 209 (C.A.A.F. 2012), it is ordered that the portion of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals as to Charge II (renumbered), Specification 2 (renumbered)(alleging adultery), and as to the sentence is reversed. The decision of that court as to the remaining charges and specifications is affirmed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to that court for further consideration in light of Humphries.

dissent opinion

*BAKER, Chief Judge

(dissenting): Consistent with my views in United States v. Humphries, 71 M.J. 209, 217 (C.A.A.F. 2012) (Baker, C.J., dissenting), and United States v. Fosler, 70 M.J. 225, 240 (C.A.A.F. 2011) (Baker, J., dissenting), I respectfully dissent.