CCA S31840. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER APPELLANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY TO CHARGE II AND ITS SPECIFICATION WAS IMPROVIDENT BECAUSE THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE II FAILED TO ALLEGE ANY ONE OF THE THREE DISTINCTIVE ELEMENTS OF ARTICLE 134 AND THEREBY FAILED TO MEET THE CONSTITUTIONAL NOTICE STANDARD SET FORTH IN SCHMUCK v. UNITED STATES, HAMLING v. UNITED STATES, AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES. No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.